True / False / Can't Tell
Recognising This Question Type
T/F/CT questions give you a statement (not a question) and three options:
- True - the passage supports this statement
- False - the passage contradicts this statement
- Can't Tell - the passage doesn't address this (not enough information)
These make up ~40-50% of VR questions and appear in 2-3 of your 11 sets. They're the bread and butter of VR.
The Technique: Targeted Read
Five steps, target 10-15 seconds per statement:
- Read the statement. Understand what it means - rephrase in your own words if needed. Don't just read the words.
- Pick your keyword. Same rules as Lesson 1.2: proper nouns, numbers, dates, distinctive terms.
- Scan the passage. Eyes move through the text looking only for your keyword or a related term.
- Read 2-3 sentences. The sentence containing the keyword plus one before and one after.
- Apply MOO. Match → True. Opposite → False. Outside → Can't Tell.
Applying MOO Logic: Decision Guide
Compare the statement to what the passage says, then apply the matching rule:
| What the passage does | Answer |
|---|---|
| Says the same thing (possibly in different words) | True |
| Says the opposite (contradicts the statement) | False |
| Says nothing about it (keyword not there, or covers a related but different point) | Can't Tell |
| You're "sure" because of outside knowledge the passage doesn't state | Can't Tell |
| Part of the statement is supported, another part isn't addressed | Can't Tell |
The golden rule of Can't Tell: If you find yourself reasoning beyond what the passage says - bringing in real-world knowledge, making assumptions, or connecting dots the passage doesn't connect - it's Can't Tell.
The #1 Student Mistake: Can't Tell vs False
This trips up more students than anything else. Here's the one-line rule:
If the passage doesn't address it at all, it's Can't Tell. If the passage says the opposite, it's False.
False requires evidence against the statement - the passage must actively contradict it. Can't Tell means the passage is silent on the topic. Think of it this way: you can't call someone a liar if they never spoke.
Worked Examples
Example 1: Direct Match (True)
Passage excerpt: "Since the early Macbooks, Apple has always been amongst the most creative and loved companies."
Statement: "Apple is considered one of the best laptop designers in the world."
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Understand statement | Apple = one of the best designers |
| Keyword | "Apple" (proper noun - but it's the main topic, so also check "designers") |
| Find in passage | "Apple has always been amongst the most creative and loved" |
| Compare | "amongst the most creative" = "one of the best" (synonym). "Loved" supports positive reputation. |
| Answer | TRUE - Match (same idea, different words) |
Example 2: Subtle Contradiction (False)
Passage excerpt: "As many foreign footballers now enjoy playing in England, Portuguese international Ronaldo followed his fellow countryman Tiago to play for Manchester United."
Statement: "Ronaldo was the first foreign footballer to play for Manchester United."
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Understand statement | Ronaldo = first foreign player at Man Utd |
| Keyword | "Ronaldo" (proper noun) |
| Find in passage | "Ronaldo followed his fellow countryman Tiago" |
| Compare | "Followed" + "fellow countryman Tiago" = Tiago was already there. Ronaldo was NOT the first. |
| Answer | FALSE - Opposite (passage says someone came before him) |
Trap: The statement sounds plausible. But "followed his fellow countryman" directly contradicts "first."
Example 3: Outside Knowledge Trap (Can't Tell)
Passage excerpt: "A volcano on Earth is a vent or fissure in the planet's crust through which lava, ash, rock and gases erupt."
Statement: "Volcanoes are a threat to human lives."
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Understand statement | Volcanoes = dangerous to humans |
| Keyword | "Threat" or "human lives" |
| Scan passage | Neither "threat" nor "human" nor "lives" appears anywhere |
| Compare | The passage defines what a volcano IS. It says nothing about danger or humans. |
| Answer | CAN'T TELL - Outside (we all know volcanoes are dangerous, but the passage doesn't say so) |
This is the classic Can't Tell trap. Your brain screams "obviously true!" but the passage doesn't address it. Ignore outside knowledge.
Example 4: Two-Part Statement Trap (False)
Passage excerpt: "Lord Eden Dell's family has owned a valued Picasso painting since 1750. He inherited the county from his father upon his death."
Statement: "Lord Eden Dell has owned the land since 1750."
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Understand statement | Two claims: (1) owns land, (2) since 1750 |
| Keywords | "1750" (date) + "land" |
| Find "1750" | "owned a valued Picasso painting since 1750" - it's about a PAINTING, not land |
| Find "land" | "inherited the county from his father" - county (land), but no date of 1750 |
| Compare | Part 1 (owns land): Partially true (owns the county). Part 2 (since 1750): False - 1750 refers to the painting, not the land. |
| Answer | FALSE - The statement merges two different facts incorrectly |
Critical trap: One part of the statement is true, giving a false sense of security. Always check EVERY part of the statement against the passage.
The 4 Language Traps
These patterns appear repeatedly in T/F/CT. Memorise them.
Trap 1: Superlative vs Comparative
Passage: "Ahmed has a higher salary than his colleagues."
Statement: "Ahmed has the highest salary in the team."
Answer: Can't Tell
Why: "higher" (comparative) ≠ "highest" (superlative). Someone else could earn even more.
Trap 2: Qualifier Mismatch
Passage: "Exercise can improve mental health."
Statement: "Exercise will definitely improve mental health."
Answer: Can't Tell
Why: "can" (possibility) ≠ "will definitely" (certainty).
Trap 3: Future Tense
Passage: "The technology shows promise for treating cancer."
Statement: "This technology will cure cancer."
Answer: Can't Tell
Why: "shows promise" ≠ "will cure". No passage can guarantee the future.
Trap 4: Reversed Logic
Passage: "All doctors are university graduates."
Statement: "All university graduates are doctors."
Answer: False
Why: Logic doesn't reverse - A → B does not mean B → A.
Quick Reference: T/F/CT Decision Table
| Situation | Answer |
|---|---|
| Statement paraphrases/matches passage | True |
| Statement uses synonyms of passage content | True |
| Basic maths from passage supports it (e.g., 25M to 2.5M = 90% drop) | True |
| Statement directly contradicts passage | False |
| Statement reverses the logic of the passage | False |
| Antonym of passage appears in statement | False |
| Two-part statement where one part contradicts | False |
| Passage doesn't mention the topic at all | Can't Tell |
| Statement uses stronger qualifier than passage | Can't Tell |
| Statement uses superlative, passage uses comparative | Can't Tell |
| Statement predicts the future with "will" | Can't Tell |
| You need outside knowledge to confirm | Can't Tell |
Common Mistakes
- Confusing False and Can't Tell - If the passage says nothing about the topic, it's Can't Tell, not False. False requires the passage to say the opposite.
- Using outside knowledge - "Everyone knows volcanoes are dangerous" -> irrelevant if the passage doesn't say it.
- Only checking half the statement - Always verify every claim in the statement, especially two-part statements.
- Spending too long - If you can't resolve it in 15 seconds, make your best guess and move on. These are worth the same as every other question.
Summary
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Technique | Targeted Read: question -> keyword -> scan -> 2-3 sentences -> MOO |
| Time target | 10-15 seconds per statement |
| True | Passage says the same thing (possibly different words) |
| False | Passage says the opposite |
| Can't Tell | Passage doesn't address it / not enough information |
| #1 mistake | Mixing up Can't Tell and False - silence = Can't Tell, contradiction = False |
| Key traps | Superlative/comparative, qualifier mismatch, future tense, reversed logic |
Next lesson: Applying the same scanning technique to "According to the passage" questions - where you have 4 answer options instead of 3.